|
Post by Blaque on May 28, 2006 22:01:29 GMT -5
What things would you do and what things would you never do to have a child? - artificial methods with own cells of he partners
- artificial methods with donated cells
- adoption
- surrogate
I'd love for my son to have a brother or a sister. Adopting is the only option for me. The other things are a little too extreme.
|
|
|
Post by dolphinfan on May 29, 2006 8:23:52 GMT -5
I actually discuss this with two women in my life, both are childless, but can't afford, the artificial way. Both were very educated women, both attractive. Just child-less. Both cases, they just wanted a donor, i didn't mind donating BUT, wether we are together or not!!! I have to be in my childs life. So while I did bed one!!(for fun) I felt it was a bad deal for me. If i were rich, I would adopt, at least three kids,hopefully brothers and sisters.
|
|
|
Post by pelicanguy on May 29, 2006 9:28:41 GMT -5
If I'm not married by say, 35 or 40, or if I get married and she can't conceive, I'd consider adoption. But I don't do artificial means. Too expensive.
|
|
|
Post by lusciouslois on May 30, 2006 8:26:34 GMT -5
My youngest is 16 so having another child by ANY means is kind of farfetched but if I had a mate who had none, I MIGHT consider adoption.
|
|
|
Post by leshonta25 on Jun 8, 2006 17:43:43 GMT -5
I think I would pick adoption there are so many kids who don't have anyone to love so I would choose that over artifical methods or a surrogate
|
|