Post by smarywills on Dec 5, 2006 16:42:39 GMT -5
That is the claim being made by Police in NY newspapers, today. Sean Bell, the dead bride-groom, and his two shot-up friends were active drug dealers.
The fabricated story is that Sean Bell and his two friends, who were also shot that night, were under police surveillance for selling drugs. In fact, an NYPD informant supposedl bought drugs from Bell and his friends 3 TIMES! So, the NYPD cop wasn't following them out of the club because of the fact that one of the men alledgely said he had a gun in his car. No! Now, they were followed because they were already suspected of a crime.
That's not gonna fly because people have already made statements. Nothing that's come out suggests the cops were discontinuing their prostituion raid to stop 3 drug dealers. The police insist that they were about to arrest the men, but were just shoring up the case to make it strong. So, now the deadman was a rampant drug dealer. How that changes any of the protocol that was violated that night is beyond me.
Sounds like the NYPD is trying to create and cement the image of a worthless Negro, so that White NY and America can say, "See, I knew the ni**er had it coming to him!" But, again, the cop that followed them and that fired the first shot only says he did so because he thought one of them said they had a gun, not in relation to anything drug related!
Reminds me of the Amadou Diallo case. After the cops pumped him with 41 bullets, they ransacked his house looking for drugs and were asking his friends if he was a drug user or drug dealer. If you can make the victim seem like someone society would like to get rid of, you're doing your job as a reckless NYPD police officer--and you can get away with murder. Revisionist HIStory is something else.
S. Mary Wills
The fabricated story is that Sean Bell and his two friends, who were also shot that night, were under police surveillance for selling drugs. In fact, an NYPD informant supposedl bought drugs from Bell and his friends 3 TIMES! So, the NYPD cop wasn't following them out of the club because of the fact that one of the men alledgely said he had a gun in his car. No! Now, they were followed because they were already suspected of a crime.
That's not gonna fly because people have already made statements. Nothing that's come out suggests the cops were discontinuing their prostituion raid to stop 3 drug dealers. The police insist that they were about to arrest the men, but were just shoring up the case to make it strong. So, now the deadman was a rampant drug dealer. How that changes any of the protocol that was violated that night is beyond me.
Sounds like the NYPD is trying to create and cement the image of a worthless Negro, so that White NY and America can say, "See, I knew the ni**er had it coming to him!" But, again, the cop that followed them and that fired the first shot only says he did so because he thought one of them said they had a gun, not in relation to anything drug related!
Reminds me of the Amadou Diallo case. After the cops pumped him with 41 bullets, they ransacked his house looking for drugs and were asking his friends if he was a drug user or drug dealer. If you can make the victim seem like someone society would like to get rid of, you're doing your job as a reckless NYPD police officer--and you can get away with murder. Revisionist HIStory is something else.
S. Mary Wills